Moderators: chossmonkey, Dom, granite_grrl, peter, Climb Nova Scotia, Matt Peck
The Mitt wrote:Darren,
Using one locking biner for a top rope anchor is not necessarily a bad thing. It's what you and your climbing partner are secure with. Depending on the situation I will use either or. Having 2 non-locking opposed and opposite do not have a significant benefit over one locked biner.
...
Just my 2 cents
Mitt
The world of climbing is not always black and white.
"So Sean did you think that those 2 30 foot trees were going to fall or did ya just want to see how many anchors you could make? How necessary was the third?" Quote from Steve P at Scapper.
The Mitt wrote:I have set up anchors with one locking biner. Mostly when bringing my second up, there is still redundancy as I am at the top as well. Although uncomfortable if that biner were to break (something that I have not even heard of in a climbing environment) then the next anchor point would be my ATC which is on another completely independent system. This would be SERENE (Solid, Efficient, Redundant, Equalized, and Non-Extending) this is also considered a minimalist system.
So the point I was trying to make (and once again not very well) is that just reading a book or taking a course is not all the information you need. Nothing can take the place of going out with someone who has experience and learning on the rock. If you see an anchor that is suspect ask why the person did what he/she did. There may be something to be learned from either end.
Mitt
mathieu wrote:To play devil's advocate: If you folks suggest that I use 2 biners for the Top anchor, then if I belay from the top with my reverso should I put 2 locking in the anchor point on the reverso?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests